Preparing for FRQ’s
Assembled
by J. Rodewald,
General rules
×
What are the
requirements for the question ‑ list, describe, cause and effect...
×
If it
asks anything besides identify, you should write at least two sentences. One
stating your clear, specific answer and the second providing supporting evidence,
examples or a detailed description.
×
Know the
difference between environmental, social, political and economic effects.
×
How many examples
are requested? If the question asks for two, only the first two will be
graded
×
If you are not
sure about the meaning of a word in the question, figure out what it means
×
Start each
question with whether it is A, B, C,... and leave a two to three line break
between each section so you can come back later to add additional information
×
Do not rewrite
the question; it is a waste of time for you and the reader
×
If
you find yourself writing something vague, follow it up with a specific
example. (Name a specific chemical that will cause the pollution and explain
its impacts, name a specific specie or type of specie that would be impacted
and explain how, name a specific law or specific possible law that will
illustrate whatever you are talking about, etc.)
×
If a
fourth grader could say it, it is too vague.
×
Be careful
with absolutes, will it really kill all the animals? Will the entire ecosystem
be harmed?
×
Often
wrong but never in doubt: even if you are making it up, make it sound good and
confident. (Be specific. You might be right, but you will not get any credit if
you are not specific enough. No "maybe" or "might" unless
there is actual scientific uncertainty.)
×
Make sure the
answers are legible
×
Always use
complete sentences.
×
Each answer should
be organized, comprehensive, and in prose form; outline form is not acceptable.
×
Drawings are
acceptable only if there is a written explanation
×
No eco‑babble
×
Do not write
anything in the green book so all your work will be in the answer document
×
Even if you can
do the math in your head, show each step
×
Include units in
each step to insure it is correct and in the answer
×
Does the answer
make sense? A monthly light bill for a family should not be in the
trillions of dollars.
There are
several strategies you can use to help boost your score on the Free Response
section of the AP Environmental Science exam. One of those strategies is to
avoid the use of vague and “flowery” terms and phrases. These terms and phrases
may sound descriptive, but they frequently say little and provide none of the
detail needed to earn credit. To avoid them you should try to explain yourself
as best as possible using more detail.
The following is a
listing of these terms and phrases to try to avoid:
1. “bad
for the environment / planet” 2.
"cause environmental degradation" 3.
"cause global warming and pollution" 4. “change” (Instead of specifying increase or decrease.) 5.
“destroy the environment” 6.
“disrupt the environment” 7.
“disturb the environment” 8.
“ecofriendly” 9. “good
for the environment” 10.
“greener” 11.
“global solution” 12.
“global catastrophe” 13.
“global cooperation” 14.
“harm the environment” 15.
"harmful / dangerous chemicals" (Without
specifying.) 16.
"help keep the habitat cleaner" 17.
“human footprint” 18.
“human impact” |
19.
“incentivize the system” 20.
"kill all the plants/animals/wildlife" 21.
"make it illegal" or "the water
law" or "the air law" (Without identifying relevant laws.) 22.
"make it more / less expensive" (When
referring to incentives.) 23.
“mother nature “ 24.
“overconsumption of natural resources” 25.
“pollute the environment” 26.
"pollute the water / air / soil" (Without
specifying.) 27.
“restore the environment” 28.
“repair the damage” 29.
“save the Earth” 30.
“save the planet” 31.
"stop global warming" 32. “sustainable” (Without elaboration.) 33. “toxins”, “pollution”, “chemicals” & “health effects”
(Without specifying.) 34.
“________ the habitat” (impact, change, alter) 35.
“________ the ecology” (destroy, restore, maintain, support, harm,
compromise, reinvent…) |
Flowery & Vague
Phrases to avoid on the AP Environmental Exam
Putting this
list into action:
Weak: “Acid deposition hurts forests.”
Strong: “Acid deposition can hurt forests in several ways. One
way is by reducing the topsoil’s ability to retain vital nutrients such as
calcium, magnesium and potassium which are needed by trees.”
Weak: “Runoff from farms can reduce water quality and harm the
environment.”
Strong: “Runoff from farms can reduce surface water quality by
introducing nutrients such as nitrates and phosphates. These compounds promote
algae growth which can reduce water clarity. Further, when the algae die their
decomposition by aerobic bacteria can also reduce dissolved oxygen levels.”
Weak: “The pollution from coal power plants causes a lot of
environmental degradation.”
Strong: “The air pollution from coal power plants includes
nitrogen oxides, sulfur oxides and mercury which have been linked to several
environmental problems including acid deposition and mercury contamination of
surface water.”
Weak: “Garbage incinerators cause a lot of air pollution.”
Strong: “Garbage incinerators generate a variety of different air
pollutants including carbon dioxide (CO2), dioxin, particulate matter (PM),
heavy metals and sulfur oxides.”
Now its your
turn:
1. Take this
weak statement: “High levels of poverty are bad for the planet.”
And make it
stronger:
2. Take this
weak statement: “Mercury contamination in food can hurt children.”
And make it
stronger:
3. Take this
weak statement: “Automobiles make a lot of air pollution which can disrupt the
environment.”
And make it
stronger: